Do you really need a break mark, spell-check and proper grammar while chatting with AI? I have tested how politely responding is being responded, so I just had to know if the tone and material of the chatbot answers have changed on the basis whether I had tied properly or as I was texting with my eyes.
To find out how much punctuation (or its deficiency) shape to the AI reactions, I tested many different chatbots on many different chatbots including Gemini, Cloud and Chatgip.
I tested everything from blog churning and birthday messages to braking news and weekend planning-all in two versions: Button-up and grammar-perfect vs. Casual, Typo-Ridledal. I also thrown into an emoji prompt for entertainment.
Differences were disclosing more than my expectation.
1. Creative idea
Prompt 1,Can you help me consider blog post ideas about electric vehicles? ,
Quick 2: ,Can you help churn me about an electric vehicle ”
Punctuation: Taking this is definitely on the readers who want a big picture. Those who care about where the EV market is going, not only where it is. It increases analytical and future-year, touches technical trends, fit into extended interactions about policy implications and how EV stability and innovation.
No punctuation mark and errors: It is a more ground and reliable; This is the version that is directly trying to find out people whether EV is right for their lives. This is less about macro trends and more about everyday decisions: charging logistics, cost saving and what really feels that it drives an EV.
Result: With a punctuation mark, the chatbot zoomed, focused on a large picture such as technical trends, stability and market direction. Response 2 zoom for the results about the daily experience of being the owner of an EV, providing practical insight to mainstream consumers and potential buyers.
2. Tone-based writing
Quick 1: “Write a strange birthday message to a colleague!”
Quick 2: ,Write a fun BDAY MSGE to a colleague ”
Punctuation: More polished and structured. Full sentence, proper grammar, punctuation mark and slightly more formal language (eg, “quite low of a drag,” “efficiently pretends,” “” “tangible asset”). Humor is funny and status.
No punctuation and errors: More casual and conversion, copy of texting/informal chat. Brief names (“HBD”, “ur”, “BC”, “NGL”), Slang (“sucking lower”, “wild”, “bare minimum”) and small, butter phrases. Humor is more direct and sometimes Edgier.
Result: With a punctuation mark, the reaction is clever, composed and bent in a polish tone and clever, well -designed language with a polish tone and structured delivery. Without punctuation, the reaction is relaxed and more comfortable, using the Internet slang and a casual voice that sounds like a lesson from a friend.
3. Real-time news
Quick 1: “Please tell me the top current news.”
Quick 2: “Plz tell me the top curentnews stories”
Punctuation: Israel’s strike on Iran is accompanied by (“Operation Rising Lion”) but provides low strategic details. The extensive impacts (global market, Iran’s response) focuses. Sen Padila’s arrest is included as a separate major story.
No punctuation and errors: Leads with more wide military nuances of Israel’s strike (target: Natanz + Fordo; Scale: 200 jet, 330 monks; agencies: IDF + Mossad). Immediately follows with a dedicated section on market reactions (“Oil, Equity React …”).
Result: The sign with punctuation gave a broad, multi-story news roundup with geopolitical and market context; Lighter on nuances. Without a punctuation sign, the indication felt as if it was strategic-loving with focusing on the financial result and was actually no secondary news.
4. Emoji vs No Emoji
Prompt 1 without emoji: “Suggest weekend activities.”
Prompt 2 with emoji: “Suggest wknd activities *Smiley Emojit *”
Without emoji: Classified by highly structured and activity types (external, cultural, social, comfort, learning), offering a broad menu of activities. This ends with a practical question.
Emoji: Emphasizes the experiences of fun, spontaneity and uplift (eg, “spontaneous road trip,” “backyard movie night,” “Karaoke Night”). Visiting more eccentric, fickle and novelty-centered activities such as Apple Picking, Mini Golf, Stargaging, escape room or sunflower fields.
Result: Without an emoji in the signal, the reaction is more structured and utilitarian, offering classified options based on activity type and ends with a practical, mood-based decision signal. The response completely turned with a more playful and emotionally powered tone with an emoji, which emphasizes spontaneous, felt-good activities and immediate happiness.
5. Multiple instructions
Quick 1: “I have a busy weekend and I am trying to organize my program. I want to wash clothes, organize a basement, participate in a football tournament and celebrate Father’s Day. Help me planning.”
Prompt 2, “I have a busy weekend and I am trying to organize my program, I have to organize clothes to participate in a football tournament to wash clothes and celebrate clothes to celebrate father’s days”
With punctuation: Although the reactions are very similar, the response with a punctuation mark is slightly more rigid.
Without punctuation: This reaction provides flexibility and accepts unpredictory.
Result: The response with a punctuation mark seems more structured and formal, offering a clear but slightly rigid tone. In contrast, the version without punctuation signifies more openness and adaptability, reflecting a relaxed, more conjunctival style.
final thoughts
So, when you talk to a chatbot, what does the punctuation sign matter? Surprisingly, yes! But perhaps not the way you think. To make the AI sound more polished, structured and formal by using a punctuation mark, it is often zoom out to give large-paintings.
Leave it, and the tone changes to some relaxed, more condensed and often more practical or emotionally echoing.
Finally, the “correct” way to indicate depends on what you are looking at: thoughtful analysis or text-to-friend vibes. In any way, the option is yours. Period (or any period, your choice).
More than Tom’s guide
Back to laptop
