Some of the best films are remakes. Think about carpenter talk, Kroneburg Fly Or Pachino ScarfesThese films are amazing, and many people do not even know that they are remakes of old films of the previous era.
However, these are rare exceptions. Most of the time when Hollywood reboots or remakes a film, it is hot garbage – but why?
6
Nostalgia is not the story
Hollywood likes nothing more than easy marketing through brand recognition. This is why we see so many sequels. Going with a name or franchise that people are already familiar, they are seen as safe. The thing is, trying to play on feelings of apathy Ghost Busters Or Conan the Barbarian If the story is bad in your new film, you will not help you a lot.
Due to the entire reason people loved the original film because they loved the story. Any film that tells a good story well is a decent shot when becoming a hit, and thinking that you can stick a popular name on a bad film, is very short -sighted and is clearly ruined to fail from the beginning.
Connected
10 Nostalgia-induction ’90s cartoons you should stream
He said how animation was defined on television.
5
Movies are a time and one place product
Robocop Peter Weller starring and directed by veteran Paul Verhoven, is one of my favorite films so far. It is a wonderful science-fi action film, and a cutting satire of corporate greed that has imitated the 80s. Most like cyberpank fiction, Robocop Works at least in part as it satirizes. Extra, shoulder pads, they are all part of a unique taste.
This is the reason that the remake of 2014 only becomes flat on its face. Trying to update Robocop What did Mool do for the 1980s to 2010. Smarmy news pundits and wars do not have the same attraction in the Middle East. When the magic of a film is associated with its era, the reboot or remake is probably a bad bet.
Connected
How to Mod Cyberpunk 2077 Phantom Liberty
Get access to hundreds of modes and enjoy additional material hours for cyberpank 2077.
4
You can’t force chemistry in an artist
Some films have an artist that adds more than the sum of his personal contribution. The film only works, because the way these actors play each other and complement each other’s performance are just unprecedented. This was the main reason (apart from poor writing) that 2016 Ghost Busters The reboot did so bad.
The original artists were lightning in a bottle, and the actors in the new film did not have the level of connection. It emerged as forced and inhuman. I cannot blame the casting people too much, or also individual actors. Sometimes people do not click on only on-screen.
Connected
5 ghost hunting gadgets (and why they don’t work)
Myth or ghost?
3
The studio does not understand what is the original great
Is there a group of people who understand less films than studio officials? Not only is there any film where officials interfere in the creative direction, practically guaranteed failure, the studio Greenlight Remakes appears that clearly does not capture nothing clearly that made the original film successful.
Take 2015 point BreakFrom the fast -directing skills of the missing director Catherine Bigloo, the film recalls that the original large part of 1991 has become a cult classic because it is so spectacular, how much it is, and how much it is, and how much the characters like. Instead, the new film takes itself very seriously, wants to be way Very gritty, and tries to wow you sterile, incredible, and so seamlessly.
Connected
Microsoft Edge’s best feature This is a hidden surfing game
Surf waves, not web.
2
Tone changes without any reason
Yes i’m going to put Another A remake of a Verhoeven film on the list, but how did he think on Earth that the camp was changing the origin total Recall Will a self-serious, clever, comic diastopian will work in science-fi film? To be fair, this new film probably Philip. The original story of the dick is more loyal to the story. After all, the whole of Mars’s cheese was invented for Verhoven’s film, but it does not make the remake a better film!
Even more important, if they do not intend to intend total Recall Remake, and a new adaptation instead We can miss this wholesale for youThen why do they use the title for the first film? It is a diagnostic cash, and a tone deaf wastage of everyone’s time in the worst time.
Connected
10 Science-Fi and Fantasy Books that should get their TV series
The source material is actually endless.
1
They try to launch a new franchise instead of a good film
I did not hate Tom Cruise Mummy Reboot. I really had a lot of fun, but the film is very suffering with a clear intention that it should launch an MCU-style film franchise. While Stephen Somers Mother Films with Brendon Fraser became a franchise, which became a franchise, it seems that the bean counter and officials could not allow just a good film to stand on their own, and then naturally lead a franchise because fans demand more. No, instead they try to set up a group of future films at the cost of the Ham-Fistli film, which you are currently watching.
Even iron ManThe MCU launch film was not made to do so. Post-credit with Nick Fury was an Easter egg for the scene fans. If the film had been bombed, it would have happened. Anything was made greenlight or planned. so iron Man Just was free to be a good film on its terms, and the rest is history.
In fact, the thing to get my goat is that most of the time when a film is a remake or remake slad, it is for a film which is not need Reboot or remake is to be done. The original is not only fine, but still a great film to watch.
Like movies Back in future Or The Nevering Story They are timeless, and they are fully preserved in high quality thanks to the magic of digital media. So let’s enjoy them like they are, and spend time and energy on new films with new original stories.
