Arc: Early reach on August 27, 2017 developed survival.
Not only a player has actually done so, he has given the arch a negative review on steam. After 35,202 hours. And surprisingly, even bravery, perhaps – they are also demanding refunds.
“I have enjoyed the arch for 35,000 hours, one of my favorite games to play with friends and family.” “I have run an ASM (Ark Server Manager) Server W/Mods till date till date. Now nothing works.”
The issue seems to be the release of the Arc Aquatika, which is a 10 -year anniversary DLC for arch: survival developed. It is currently rated as “heavy negative” on steam, with only 12% reviews positive. Not only users are reporting bugs and poor performances for DLC, but also that it breaks modes, server settings and configuration files throughout the game.
“The server does not match, the modes do not work, and all this is to force us to the ASA (Arc: Survival Esswal, Remasted version of Arc),” the 35,000 -hour player continues in his review. “I also have that game, and it is useless. That’s why we went back to ASE (Ark: Developed Survival) and now you too have managed to screw.
“You had something great. Hope you don’t choke on your greed !!! How will I get refund !!” They conclude.
By the way, 35,202 hours, four years. I do not mean that they have been playing arc for four years, I mean they add 35,202 hours A complete, solid four yearsEven if it contains an uptime of running a server, it is Big Arc fan you have urinated. Perhaps the biggest?
For records, it appears that publishers know about snail sports issues. “Our highest priority remains to fix a problem with the game engine on the live version of the arch: survival developed,” reads a post. On the steam page of the arch Today, saying that the problem is “complex” is “complicated” and that “a solution is developed to address the modes from continuous crash and we are ready to post the update when possible.”
This is not the first time we have seen a negative review from a player with hundreds or thousands of hours in a game – Joshua recently tracked someone who played Battlezone 98 for 8,000 hours, only to leave a negative review. (In addition, Joshua is causing wounds with him).
But this is the largest to be the largest, right? 35,000 hours in the same game? I don’t think I have ever seen that level of commitment, especially with that level of despair. Do you know what? I hope they to do get a refund.
It is worth noting that even after writing its scary prosecution of arch and demanding his money back, the reviewer has played 32 hours additional, um in the last week. Does this mean that one of the recent patch has improved the situation? I have reached him for further comments, and if I listen back, I will update this story.
Best Gaming Rigs 2025
