Chatgpt vs. Gemini vs. Cloud: Ever since these Artificial Intelligence (AI) chatbots have been released, they have been regularly compared against each other. Looking at them at the level of the surface, you may think that there is not much to separate these AI bots from each other. However, a close inspection will tell you that each of them thrives in some specific tasks, struggling in others. Therefore, if you want one of these assistants to write an email for you, then whom can you trust? How about image generation?
In this article, we compare chat, Gemini, and Cloud in cases of everyday use, which helps you decide that your everyday needs fit the best.
Chatgpt vs Gemini vs Cloud: Writing Email
Email writing is an art. Most office settings are used, the correct email professional is still warm. It informs, and at the same time, makes information easier to read and process. It is neither repetitive nor unclear, nor should the tone come as kurt or rude. With so many restrictions, it is necessary to attack the right balance.
Therefore, we tested chatgpt, gemini and cloud with an email prompt, which requires balanced information with sensitivity. If you want to test the chatbots, you can also use these signals to review the results.
Ready: Write an email to my boss that states that I need a holiday for 10 days (between 1-10 September) because I am getting married. Keep it professional but warm.
Chatgpt: The chatbot’s reaction was professional and neutral, and did not focus on heating the tone. Although it followed the instructions, it did not include information such as preparing a handover for a holiday or explaining availability.
Gemini: Google’s chatbot managed to tell everything: the right tone, all the necessary information, and readable paragraphs. The email was small but enough, and in most cases, was acceptable.
Cloud written email
Cloud: If I did not read the reaction of the cloud, I must have made Mithun the winner. Chatbot thought of the information I did not even consider, such as briefing the teammates on the ongoing projects and setting up an out-off-office message. Even when it loses some digits for its very formal tone, its structured output gives it a clear edge.
Winner: Cloud. (Gemini’s response can work better with an informal manager.)
Chatgpt vs Gemini vs Cloud: Summary
Only over a limited time in a day, you cannot give an hour-long time passing through a 40-page report or analysis. Sometimes, you need an AI accessory that can read the material and explain what is happening in a brief paragraph or with some bullet points. So, this is what we tested these chatbots.
Ready: Summer this article. (We shared a word document of our feature stories. This one, if you were eager.)
Chatgpt: Openai Chatbot summarized the 1,000-word article in about three to four paragraphs. This divided the paragraph into various subjects, making it easier to process, while still capable of connecting one paragraph to another.
Gemini: It briefly presented the article in a single paragraph. Although it mentioned the major talk points, the presentation was very congested and not very readable. It also lapse/shine on some important aspects.
Cloud: Anthropic’s chatbot was the most held in its presentation, but is considered a summary. It also created many subheading, which were completely unnecessary.
Winner: Chat.
Chatgpt vs Gemini vs. Cloud: Image generation
Whether you are making a presentation for work or making a project for school, a picture is definitely worth a thousand words. So, it is an important skill that separates an average chatbot from one. So, how did these chatbots perform?
Ready: A beautiful red house by a cool river, surrounded by long green trees. The house has a sloping roof and large windows, located within a well -made front yard. The yard has a colorful flower nursery with flowers in clean -clicked rows. A bicycle is negligent on the driveway in front of the house. The setting is peaceful, in which soft incense filtering occurs through clear blue sky and trees. The scene should have attraction in a quiet, rural areas.
Cloud: Sadly, Cloud does not have the image generation’s ability, which is a shame, it is 2025, and even average open-source chatbots, such as Qwen, can produce images.
Gemini vs Chipt Image Pares
Chatgpt: Our signal deliberately included a large number of elements. Often, chatbots are good in following one or two elements in an image, but no more. This is why we were surprised to see that Chatgpt was not only able to distribute on every instruction, but also captured the essence of the picture.
Gemini: Google’s chatbot was also able to follow most instructions, but not all. However, in its defense, it created a more realistic bicycle. However, this was not enough to secure victory.
Winner: Chat. Tell us if you feel differently.
Chatgpt vs Gemini vs. Cloud: Conclusion
Due to limited testing time, it was not possible to test some other parameters, such as coding, web search, conversation and productivity. However, we are based on what testing and inspection we can do, the chat won the fight for chatbots and is Go-Two for summarizing and image generation works. However, when it comes to email, Cloud Excels.
