A follow -up question about the final score was answered correctly, but Mithun first got the name of the touchdown scorer: AI suggested that it was Johan Dotson. Dotson was shown receiving a touchdown in highlights with a score of 0–0, but it was dismissed-an example of artisans that AI is not necessary.
Mithun successfully identified that the heads of the Canasus City got their first points, and even the YouTube clip included a timestamp connected to the touchdown. It also got the name of the scorer. It seems that Gemini is very much dependent on the comment for the game clip, which is not surprising.
Combine video content briefly
Next, we tried to put Mithun against one Back and forth features For the Grand Budapest Hotel directed by Wes Anderson. The clip lasts for four and a half minutes, and Mithun almost immediately evacuated some answers: it was being talked about the name of the film, and the main beating of the fiction of the clip.
However, it is again dependent on the audio (or transcript) – there is no analysis of the actual video content. AI could not say who the heads in the video were, even though their names were shown on the screen, and were not able to say who was the director who was also mentioned in the video description).
On the plus side, Mithun did an impressive job of covering the audio of the video. It correctly identified some challenges of filmmaking, mentioned, and they were provided Timstamps – looking for a set to represent the Grand Budapest, to fill it with extra.
Interview briefly
Finally, we tried Google Gemini With an interview: Talking about the latest series to Channel 4 Charlie Bruker and Sienna Kelly in Britain black Mirror (Perhaps suitable for an article on AI). Mithun proved himself very competent in choosing talking points and adding timestamps, although definitely the entire video is talking mostly.
However, there is no reference to anything outside the audio or transcript. Mithun AI cannot say where the interview took place, or how the participants were acting, or something else about the video scene – which is worth keeping in mind if you use it yourself.
For those videos where the answers you want is in the audio of a YouTube video, and in its affiliated transcript, Gemini actually works well in providing and providing accurate answers (mentioning the commentators when a touchdown is denied, as well as when a score is done). For any kind of visual information, you still want to watch the video yourself.
