Experts estimate that by 2035, AI will have Remake the societyChanging everything from healthcare to jobs and human contacts, and, if you believe that senior vice -president of Apple’s Senior Vice President, AD Q, it can also indicate the end of our deepest technical relationship: We have with our iPhone.
Google guardian alphabet, in testimony during the no -confidence case of the US Department of Justice against Q, Bloomberg according toShared this revelation: “You may not need an iPhone after 10 years from now as it seems that it seems.”
Tim Cook Spring, CEO of Queue Apple. While Cook wipes coffee from its MacBook screen, let’s discuss.
I agree, it is an apple executive to expand the Apple services from far and wide, often with the iconic iPhone as a portal. However, Q comments came in the midst of AI’s growing influence and a major discussion about its location as a changemaker.
In the near period, this means that Apple is reportedly now looking at the possibility of shifting Google from its prime spot, as the safari has a default search engine for iPhones, iPads and MACS. Replacement? Probably an AI search engine.
It makes sense. We are already looking at people with a summary of traditional search results and endless pages of their endless blue links with a summary of Google AI overview, Perplexity, Chatgpt, Copilot, etc., they can not be accurate, but they are sufficient for most people.
It’s not addition
I have trouble, however, reflecting Q’s controversy that we may not need iPhone and other smartphones in a decade (by extension). It is almost the same as he said, “Hey, we are all in danger in the rapidly detail of AI, even the most profitable business section of Apple (the iPhone was built in the last quarter for about half $ 95B Apple), so when you think – just here – Sprintballing – Spitballing – We can fight for our lives by 2035 by 2035.
Think about your relationship with your iPhone or Android. It is deep. that’s personal. You catch it and raise it like a loved one
AI is a great device, but it will not swim in the ether after 10 years from now. Artificial intelligence, large language model (LLM), and interfaces (text or voice) should remain somewhere. We have already seen that most people are not interested in the weedable AI. They still want a screen, preferably those who fit their pockets, backpacks or bags.
We will not walk around a city, shouting in space, hoping that a local AI beacon hears us and responds. We will do?
the love of your life
Except for a second, just stop and think about your relationship with your iPhone or Android. It is deep. that’s personal. You catch it and raise it like a loved one – you definitely stare at the screen of your phone for a long time, as much as you catch another human gaze. Is that relationship going to separate in 10 years?
I have a lot of doubt that we will keep all our important information elsewhere – all those apps, services and digital currency, we need them on our fingers. What will you tap to pay if you don’t have your phone? Okay, perhaps your watch, but the phone will still be in your hand in 2035, and I am sure you are still using it.
It is possible that Q is trying to tell us something else, and it is Apple’s other long -term strategy: Ar glasses.
What about wearables?
We know Tim Cook likes a lot of reality, And while the Vision Pro is not hopeful for global hit Apple, light AR glasses are definitely in Apple’s strategic plan. Assuming that they have a wide area of visual interfaces, voice and gesture control, and excellent Apple Intelligence AI has been promised to us (a Siri that can eventually compete with chat), they may be an iPhone replacement for many.
If, and it is a large, then, Q is actually talking about Apple Iglasses, then the loss of utility of the iPhone is almost understandable. But this is a big stretch. Creating such a bold statement that we may not need iPhones in a decade, it is border irresponsible and assumes that AI will not only be omnipresent, but it would be so good that we will no longer need hardware-based assistants.
I think AI would be better and smarter, but even more frightening. By 2035, such a large-scale backlash may be that half the population is anti-anti and refuses to use it in any form. The iPhone may be their primary tool for communication, organizing and spreading good anti-AI anti-word. Good luck is faster the device with their sweat.
