Cloud constantly affects me with thoughtful reactions and fine conversations that make really helpful. It often gives me the same depth that I need. Nevertheless, some limitations continuously switch me back to Chatgpt for specific characteristics that lack clouds.
5
No image generation breaks my creative workflow
When I need to imagine thoughts or create a quick diagram, the cloud hangs me. No underlying image is generation, and this is something that I often need to work.
Chatgpt in March 2025 in its interface originally introduced the image generation, which was operated by the GPT-4O model. You can describe a concept and get a visual representation immediately, and there is no doubt, the image of Chatgpt is better than the generation madness, which is useful to explain churning sessions or ideas.
Connected
GPT-4 vs. GPT-4O vs. GPT-4O Mini: What is the difference?
With so many different GPT-4 models, whom should you use?
However, it forces a strange workflow. I will start a conversation with Cloud because its argument is often better, which is one of the reasons for using a cloud instead of chat. But the moment I need a diagram, illustration, or even a simple visual aid, I must completely switch the platforms.
This is particularly disappointing because the cloud provides understanding and provides detailed explanation. Its preview window is best to review complex reactions, yet you cannot get the same thoughtful approach applied to visual materials.
Breaks my concentration behind the platforms, disrupts the conjunctive flow that makes the cloud so effective in the first place.
4
The mobile app feels after a stripped-down
Claude’s mobile app seems basic than the feature-rich interface of Chatgpt. When you open a chatgpt, you see the action button on the home screen Picture, “Analyze the data,” And “Help me write“In the middle of othersOn the other hand, Cloud displays a simple text box, which puts a full burden on you to start the conversation.
Differences become more pronounced when you excavate deeply. The Chatgpt memory provides a GPT store filled with memory settings, custom instructions, an image library and special equipment.
Some settings of clouds look like a later. It has basic options for color mode and font style, but remember the depth of personalization that can make it more useful when going.
The sidebar of Chatgpt provides quick access to your conversation history, saved signals and a broad library of equipment. Coming into the cloud, it just provides the outfit, and it does not make for overall rare experience.
This minimum approach is not necessarily bad, as you can switch between different references and keep the conversations conducted by the subject. Mobile apps should feel purposeful, and it can be somewhat subjective, as it depends on what you want to achieve.
3
Claude’s ecosystem seems alone than Chatgpt
The ecosystem of Chatgpt makes the cloud feel isolated. The GPT store offers thousands of special equipment, such as coding accessories and writing editors who expand functionality by cloud methods, may not yet match.
When I need a specific task, such as legal document analysis or marketing copy like a generation, a custom GPT is usually prepared for it.
Cloud Code provides artifacts-pre-made equipment such as converters, flashcard generators and writing editors. They work well for basic functions, and the quality is continuously high. But the selection seems curate instead of community-operating.
The integration landscape tells the same story. Chatgpt connects with countless third-party services, browser extensions and workflow automation tools. Cloud provides limited API access, but lacks widespread ecosystems that make AI really useful for complex workflows.
You can also set a chatgpt as a voice assistant of your phone to integrate it in your daily workflow and free it from hands. Whereas currently, Cloud lacks this capacity.
Connected
Now you can integrate even more depth chat in your iPhone
Say goodbye to Google discoveries.
The community aspect also matters. The user base of Chatgpt gives more indications, creates custom solutions, and makes each other’s work. Cloud looks like working almost alone.
2
Interface gives priority to simplicity on power
The cloud interface is clear, perhaps very clean. It seems that Anthropic chose a minimum design, which is great for beginners. But for someone who uses these devices daily, simplicity feels like a limit. I want to provide power features easily. It is a trade-off that currently does not favor my workflow.
The design reminds me of a book, with its serif fonts and cool color scheme. Comfortable for long -term reading sessions, it does not shout a powerful technical equipment. The interface of Chatgpt, although something seems less comfortable, looks more like a modern application for complex tasks.
This focus on simplicity means that more advanced functionality feels to deal rather than integrated. However, the overall experience lacks all-in-one toolkit that competitive offers.
So, the elegance of the interface comes at the cost of utility for electricity users. While the clean beauty is visually attractive, it does not support a feature-rich workflow.
1
When cloud works when it does not happen
I have found that Cloud excel in actions that require deep thinking. Complex coding problems are fully clarified rather than quick improvement. Detailed analysis, such as breaking of research papers or evaluating CSV files, demonstrate the strength of the task cloud. Therefore, when I need to understand why some work does some work instead of doing some work, the cloud consistently gives thoughtful reactions.
However, creative projects constantly send me back to the slapping. Of course, Cloud can analyze images uploaded by me, but it cannot generate them.
Extended work sessions highlight another weakness. Strict use limitations on the cloud often force me to begin new interactions, breaking the reference and flow of a project. With Chatgpt, I can have a constant conversation that recalls the reference in days, and I can give it a specific personality symptoms to match it with better needs. I sometimes explain to Cloud to re-explain the project details, which kills productivity.
This creates an ongoing membership dilemma because neither the platform I need everything I need. Paying for both seems excessive, yet each has irreparable strength that continues to switch me between them, never just on the same solution.
