If you wanted a sense of current relationship between Tech Right and Populists, then you had to sit in the breakout room C on the first day of Nataton 5, which was the annual gathering of the powerhouse of Maga Wright. At the end of the afternoon panel on culture wars (“required for valor”), Jeffrey Miller was handed over the mic and began to plum one of the panelists: Palentir’s Chief Technology Officer Shyam Shankar, who is in charge of the company’s AI efforts.
“My argument is that the AI industry almost does not overlap with national conservatism,” Miller said referring to the main ideology of the conference. Hours ago, Miller, a psychology professor at the University of New Mexico, was on the platform for a panel called “AI and the American Sol”, calling for a literal sacred war against artificial intelligence developers for local people, “as the beliefs of our species, they inspire our children, inspiring our children, and our children, and our children inspire our children, and our children, and our children, we were in the form of faith Are.” Now, he saw the technologist correct, who had just given a speech that the technical founding founder was heroic as the father, who is sacred figures for Natakon. The AI industry was, he told Shankar, “Big, global, secular, liberal, feminine transhumanist. They clearly want unemployment, they plan for UBI-based communism, and they see human species as a biological ‘bootloader, as they say to artificial superintendents.”
If you throw a rock under the hall of Westin Hotel, you had a high chance to kill someone contributing to Project 2025.
Shankar carried out a calm defense, which took advantage of the right Natkon Vocabulary (“I think the widely secular culture of the Silicon Valley has filled the size of God in his heart with this belief towards AGI.”) But in the next several days, it appeared that Shankar was one of the very few attendees with pure positive views of AI. Nataton was home to intellectual rights dominating the government of Donald Trump – if you throw a rock under the hall of Westin Hotel, you had a high chance to kill someone who contributed to Project 2025 – and that week there were two subjects in everyone’s mind that week: Eradication of support for Israel’s rightsAnd existing threats which technology is ready for Western civilization.
Tech Right and Maga Populists summarized the White House to attain an anti -Trump, and as a fracture of their alliance, Vice President JD Vance, a Peter Theal Protage, which several times attended Nataton, tried to serve as a bridge between them. But this year’s Natakon has made it clear that the factions are no longer on the same page.
About half the panels of the conference were clearly focused on the tech. Tech school is atrophating its children’s minds and destroying important ideas in universities. Weakening the Tech American economy, weakening tech national defense and international dominance, attacking the tech Judeo-Christian trust and destroying humanity.
Others claimed that AI development would lead to ‘civilized suicide’
His enmity was different: Some admitted that AI was not going away and maybe Some? Social benefits are correctly exploited, while others claimed that AI development would further “civilized suicide”. But almost all speakers expressed a deep, emotional doubt against the technical industry.
Even the threat of Chinese AI dominance was not enough to dominate him, nor was the fact that Trump himself signed funding projects such as Stargate. “The state’s own argument for AI acceleration is quite clear about it: ‘We should defeat China and increase the economy,” Michael Toso said during his Thursday’s talk Michael Toscano, director of Family First Technology Initiative. “These, of course, are important implications for the future of Americans, but the message is one of a barren life: ‘To defeat China, you must be ready to participate with everything including a happy future for your children and grandchildren.”
Trump’s colleagues were saying that it was from Steve Bannon to Josh Hale to Mike Benz. And even top administration officials kept in Big Tech: Dr. J. Bhattacharya, who was disintegrated to question the origin of Kovid and was later appointed by Trump by Trump to lead the National Institute of Health to lead by Trump, claimed that the technical companies doing “censorship” had set back the scientific progress.
This enmity had been boiling for years on the right, Dean Ball said, “A former senior policy advisor on AI and emerging technology at Trump White House, which also spoke in Nataton 5.” “It fulfills the feeling that I think it was accurate for a long time,” he said. Ruckus“That technical industry was hitting against conservatives to silence conservative views.” He ran through a partial list of Big Tech offenses: Elgorithm Daman, Twitter ban, demonetisation, section 230, “incorrect information” and after that material labeled.
But although the technical industry is no longer actively considered a sensor after the choice of conservatives, it is as if it is disabled. No Following cultural, intellectual and religious values of social conservators. For example, social media addiction and chatbots marketing towards children, for example, feed directly into right -wing terror on family values. (This panel was the subject of “Tech and the Future of the Family”.) Biohaking and genetic modifications are a direct insult to the Christian laws of nature. And transhumanism – the idea that technology will directly increase humanity – there is an opposition to God’s compositions, a point created during the first speech of the conference.
During the first speech of the conference, Rachel Boward, vice -president of the programs at the influential Conservative Partnership Institute, said, “Orthodox is about human dignity and human flight.” “According to the definition, there is no such thing as transhuman conservative.”
Ball said Right AI Antipathy was so deep that it had permanently excluded Elon Musk.
Ball said Wright’s AI Antipathy was so deep that it had permanently deported Elon Musk, which he once considered a true ideological ally. “If a socially conservative person was using a language model, he would use the groc, as he trusted the groke,” he said. But the moment Musk released the generic AI porn feature of Groke Zai, he lost the goodwill of Right, highlighting the “Hentai Sex Bots”. (Extremely United Nations-Christian stance on resolving breeding crisis Did not help in cases, either.)
Animus towards AI in Nataton was enough to indicate some pre -east heretical ideas, such as joining forces with labor unions. “(They) is a long history of facing technological changes and should be considered as a historic dead weight force for anti-modernization as experiences and sources of knowledge,” at one point Toskano argued, if Trump managed to bring right-wing and unions together, it would go down as the largest presidents in history.
When we talked the next day of the conference, one of the few people in the ball – Natcon, who expressed optimism about the future of technology in the US – expressed their concern that the doubt of the movement of large technology could not be overcome from a strong policy debate. “I AM On the right, “he said,” but I say this to my friends all the time: you can discuss a very appropriate discussion about what technically, what we should do to make the chatbot safe for children. I do not think if you are not really your purpose, you can discuss a very fruitful discussion, and in fact your purpose is basically, a type of religious war against technology and technology. ,
At the beginning of the conference, Shankar – The most prominent representative in Natakon of the AI industry, who could harm Palauntir’s relations with the Trump administration if he said wrong in that room – was also noted crying. “AI genie is out of the bottle – which is not a transhumanist future,” he said in response to Miller. AI’s own vision was a powerful tool for entrepreneurs Americans “was busy rolling their sleeves.” AI, he said, “is a specific American phenomenon,” one that he claimed that “can change the world and promote our values.”
Unfortunately, until the end of Natcon, no one agreed with Shankar. Steve Bainon said during the comment, “Yes, Artificial Intelligence may have tremendous deflation.” “But you are seeing in a bottomless pit. This is a negative aspect that no one understands and no one can clarify. And the last thing I want is a group of people on the spectrum in Silicon Valley – who are not sure that I am also devoted to the United States, because they are talking about the network system to these strange people and ‘we don’t want a country’ – I don’t want a country.”
The crowd exploded in applause.
0 Information
