I try a lot of extensions in Firefox, Chrome and Edge, both individually and professional. But when I faced an unfamiliar expansion, how do I know that it is safe and safe? The purpose of a new website is to warn you about suspicious and malicious extensions, before you try to install them.
Too: 5 Browser Extension Rules 2025 to live your system safe
Browser Safety Provider LARX launched by Free Extendedly Wants to help individuals and enterprises equally by identifying the risky browser extensions. This online database evaluates the safety of over 200,000 extensions in chrome, firefox and age.
Yes, browser manufacturers try to vet the extension before pop up in each related store, including Chrome Web Store, Firefox add-on And Edge Aid-onBut sometimes a malicious expansion can take away previous security, especially a one who mimics a valid program.
Too: I found a malicious chrome extension on my system – here it is told how and what I did next
User ratings and reviews can also help determine whether an extension is valid and reliable. But even they cannot reveal risk and weaknesses that can carry a special extension.
An additional layer of information
ExtensionPedia provides an additional layer of information by stating which extensions are safe, risky or malicious. The site gives rate to each extension with risk scores and risk levels. In general, the lower the rating, the more secure the extension will be. You can browse listing for many popular extensions or find a specific by name.
as example, Chat search Earned a risk score of 1 out of 10, last pass 2.1 out of 10, and Grammatically 1.2 out of 10. However, the risk score explains only part of the story. Lastpass is quoted for the permissions required for this and for the weaknesses that can be exploited, two of which have been significantly rated. Grammar also requests some permissions and has two important weaknesses.
Also: Google, Microsoft, Facebook, and more high -scale data breech exposes 184 million passwords
Other extensions receive very high risk scores. GrubbyA chrome extension with 100,000 users and 1,600 ratings earns a risk score of 7.4, while Edge Extension Wholesale image downloaderWith more than 100,000 users, but no reviews, take a risk of 8. Further details go round the picture.
Sneaks a ding for permissions. Here, the extension of the extension of this extension can affect the proxy permission of how your internet traffic is rooted, which opens the door to the man-in-in-media attacks. Bulk image downloader receives five ding for permissions with an important vulnerability, one high, two mediums and a low.
Bottom line
You want to see all the information provided for each extension, including risk score, reputation risk, and scope of permission.
The analysis is based on anonymous data taken from millions of browser sessions using the LARX platform. The page for each extension also includes its store, category, final update, store link, developer, version, store rating and number of ratings.
Too: Best secure browser for privacy in 2025: Specialist tested
“While browser extensions are often considered harmless, in practice they are often provided wide access permissions for users’ identification information and data, hackers have led them to use them as an attack channel for credential theft, account acquisition, and data theft,” the co-founder and CEO or Ashed said in a press release. “When one establishes a browser extension – either for personal or work – users and their organizations do not know what is allowed in each extension, how honored the extension writer is, and the risk profile of extension.”
Get top stories of morning with us in your inbox every day Tech Today Newsletter.
