The Motion Picture Association (MPA) has called for an automatic blocked system to block online piracy in real time, and bypassed the need for court approval.
The body represents major streaming giants including Disney+, Netflix, and Warner Bros. It has urged VPN providers, proxy and content delivery systems (CDNs), such as cloudfare, joining with groups and implementing dynamic blocking.
Internet blocking goes against the main principles of the best VPN and this step follows the same demands by Canal+ and Lignu de Football Professional (LFP) in France.
Leading VPN providers were given a major setback as the canal+ won a legal case that ordered VPN providers to block illegal sports streaming sites.
While VPN providers do not condemn the use of VPN for illegal activities, blocking the site has a widespread impact on internet freedom.
What is the demand for MPA?
In 2023, European Union Commission published recommendations How to compete online piracy. In this report, VPN was not directly targeted, but the use of “dynamic prohibition” was part of its recommendations, as well as “cooperation” between right holders and middlemen.
The Commission encouraged VPN providers to consider “voluntary measures to prevent their services from misusing”.
First Reported by torrentfreakMPA responded to the end of May 2025. it Presented your comments The implementation of the proposals and the implementation of the recommendations of the countries and the discrepancies among others referred to the discrepancies.
The MPA said, “Europe is remembering effective and proper implementation of these provisions in all member states.”
The MPA called for automated blocked techniques, which would enable rightsholders to deal with piracy and copyright violations in real time.
“MPA supports automated effective siteblocking mechanisms that can be updated in real time with suitable safety measures to address currents of emerging violations,” the group said.
It also cited the use of this technology in other countries, “In Italy, Greece, Portugal and Brazil are available in automatic dynamic systems available to right -witted rights allowing real -time blocks.”
Effect on VPN
According to the MPA, cooperation is necessary and more middlemen must have a role in combating piracy. It states that CDNS “has the technical ability to apply targeted blocks at the infrastructure level”, but is called proxies and VPN for co-operating, saying that they “provide essential services to piracy operators.”
Many people argue that VPN is being wrongly targeted. When Canal+ first initiated legal action against VPN providers collection, VPN Working Group, VPN Trust Initiative (VTI), was quick to protect the VPN services.
It states: “VPN is not the architect of piracy. They neither stores, nor promote copyright materials. Such materials are not discovered and not referred to through privacy-focused VPN tools. VPN services are targeted for activities that they do not promote or preach.”
After the canal+ case ruling, Internet Infrastructure (i2) alliance – an internet freedom and privacy advocacy group – condemned blocked orders.
“This blocked approach – which has failed in the past – depends on blunt technical equipment rather than accurate enforcement tools to address the actual sources of piracy. So it will not reduce violations, and will only cause widespread collateral damage.”
By adding that “morally operated VPN does not host illegal access to copyright materials, stores, or promote”-they “prohibited”.
The MPA wants when it comes to identifying operators of piracy sites. It said that rightsolders should be able to use “Right to Information” requests to identify individuals and want the European Union to know its “Kybc)” KyBC) “expand the requirements for online mediators.
Trusted VPN provider maintains strict no-logs policies, which means they collect and store less information as possible-bare minimum with private VPN.
If VPNs do not collect and store identifying information of their users and do not record which sites they go to, it would be practically impossible to comply with the requests of identity.
The recent Greek legal case of Windscribe Boss Yigor Sak exposed how important the no-legs policies are. The fact that Windscribe had no identifiable data to hold hands, an important reason that the case against Sak was dropped.
Protecting users’ privacy is a fundamental role of VPN and will not risk major VPN providers. Proton VPN CEO Andy Yen recently said that Proton would leave Switzerland to Switzerland, which would follow a controversial proposed amendment for the Swiss Encryption Act.
At this stage, no legal action is being taken against VPN, but there is a growing, negative attitude towards VPN and anti-piracy.
We test and review VPN services in terms of legal recreational uses. For example: 1. Using a service from another country (subject to the terms and conditions of that service). 2. Protect your online security and strengthen your online privacy abroad. We do not support or condemn the illegal or malicious use of VPN services. Consuming pirated materials that are paid, neither support nor approved by future publication.
