Today there are many wireless earbuds in the world. In fact, in this exact moment, there are no less than three pairs (counting) in the pocket of my coat, because I type these words. It is a lot of earbuds for a person, and this figure becomes only more ridiculous when you consider that all the three couples are from the same company from the same company – and they were all released at the same time.
In question, the company is CMF, which is a sub-brand of the audio-turn-phone company, nothing. Last month, CMF issued three separate couples of wireless yearbuds – Buds 2A, The Buds 2, and The Buds 2 Plus. If you are saying to yourself, “it seems excessive,” then I am compromising with you, but hold your decision till the end because things are going to be even more complicated.
View Buds 2A in Amazon
View Buds 2 on Amazon
View Buds 2 Plus in Amazon
All three wireless earbuds have different prices; All three have different levels of active noise cancellation (ANC); And all three have different drivers. This means, as you are learning, all three of them provide a different hearing experience, and this means you should know what you are doing before rolling the dice and buying a pair. But where do you start? Spec sheets are helpful, but they only bring you till now. This is the experience of using them – decibels on a chart that may not be real intelligent may not be – which really matters. If there was only a person who tried to tell you which pair you need and which you can forget possible …
Nothing by by Buds 2 Plus by CMF
CMF Buds 2 can be the most expensive of Plus pack, but they are still the most bang for deer. Trust me, you will hear the difference – I am sure.
Professionals
-
Strong bass
-
Good dynamic limit
-
affordable
Shortcoming
-
No orange color
-
Sometimes a sound like buds
If you have not received me-I have not received a sub-signal, then I tried all the three couples of the new couple of wireless earbuds to answer my burning question: Which pair of Buds 2 you should get? The answer may not surprise you, but before we reach our experience and comparison, let’s start in the beginning. What is happening with these wireless earbuds?
First, at the lowest end, Buds is 2A, which I have got in this attractive orange color that 2 plus does not come in unfortunately. Naturally, these wireless earbuds have the lowest level of everything in the imagination department, and they also have the lowest price. Buds 2A 42 Deciberation of noise cancellation, a 12.4 mm bio-fiber driver, and 5 -hour battery with ANC 8 hours with life and ancThey do retail at a very reasonable cost of $ 49.
Then, the middle child is: Buds 2, which, if you are walking with, there is a slightly high glasses and a slightly higher price, although there is actually a big warning on the front that I will find in a moment. Buds 2 has 48 decibels of cancellation of noise, 11 mm PMI drivers have been extended by derek opto tuning, and 7.5 hours of battery with ANC 13.5 hours with life and ANC. Here where things become interesting; They usually retail on $ 10 premium compared to Buds 2A (this $ 59), but as this writing, they are $ 10 off, which makes them the same price of $ 49.
Finally, there is Buds 2 Plus, which is nothing of the most recent lineups of CMF’s cosmus cram de la cram (forget the buds 2 Pro that came out for a moment last year) – which is now with me – now the highest price tag. Buds 2 Plus has 50 decibels of adaptive noise cancellation (only slightly more than buds 2, but with 5400Hz frequency range contrary to the 5200Hz range), a 12 mm liquid crystal polymer driver, and 14 hours of ANC playback and non-NNC playback out of the case of 7.5 hours. They, as I told, is the most expensive among the three pairs at $ 69.
Ok, got it all found? Stay with me, now! The lineup is misleading, and there is no way to be around, with a slight change in its same names, appearances and facilities and prices. Don’t worry, however, for all (included ourselves), we are going to keep all that aside for a moment and get down to the brass tack: what do these things really seem? On that front, I have received good news and bad news.
I have been using CMF’s budget wireless buds for the last few weeks, and I honestly did not know what expected. Sometimes you really get what you pay for (see: this Pocket -shaped earbuds clearly bad pair I reviewed from Jlabs) and sometimes the cheapest option is really the best (see: Nothing ear (a) wireless earbudsDue to that variability, I came into a trio of CMF wireless buds with an open mind, but finally, I wondered what I got.
As a test, I heard the same song (My bloody valentine “only shallow”) With each pair, back-to-back-to-back, and under the same conditions-a fairly quiet area of the office. The highest-end pair, starting first with The Bads 2 Plus, I worked in my own way until I kill Buds 2A.
© Raymond Wong / Gizmodo
© Raymond Wong / Gizmodo
So let’s start from above: CMF Buds 2 Plus Sound Great. The dynamic range is, and noise cancellation, although not world class, is sufficient for your metro commut (an environment I have also tested all three buds). Frankly, I think they are almost as good as ear (A), which is probably nothing for the price and design, my favorite couple of wireless earbuds. Among all, I am a fan of CMF Buds 2 Plus. I will not choose them as my “daily driver”, so to speak, just because I love the ceramic driver more on ear wireless earbuds and their transparent design, but if I was forced to use them, I would not be crazy about quality.
Subsequently, I tried CMF Buds 2, The Middle Child, which did not sing enough like Buds 2 Plus, while being pleasant. They do an equally good job of imitating bass, but they are definitely a little madier than their premium-value counterparts. ANC, as I suspected, was similar to 2 plus, based on the level of noise cancellation in CMF’s spec sheet, which is good, but if you are looking for the highest loyalty, then 2 plus wins in this round.
Then the child is – CMF does 2A tomorrow. This is where I saw the biggest dropoff. While the price is very acceptable, these buds make the sound of tinnests from the lineup so far and bring the lowest level of cancellation of the noise. It was difficult to notice when I was testing wireless buds and randomly and randomly on my morning commut, but I am not a great fan of cancellation of noise on dynamic range or Buds 2A. I would say that you get what you pay for you, but the price of these buds is now similar to Bads 2, and the midrange pair leaps and boundaries are better.
So, they are unscientific conclusions. In this case, Buds 2 Plus justifies the premium value, and while the Buds 2 are serving, they certainly do not provide the same quality. You can forget about all the Buds 2A because they do not deliver anywhere near the sound quality of Balis 2, which are now Same drawn priceBut just to ensure that I was not affecting my decision, I tested a blind test to see if I could really hear the difference, and most of my impressions remained the same.
In an eye hearing test, I was able to correctly identify three different wireless buds in a row on two different styles (rock and hip-hop), although some are on frequencies where the differences are difficult to notice, such as more “cinematic” music with low frequencies to track more. Buds 2A is a dead cheaper with its tinney, almost hollow sound, and buds 2 and Buds 2 Plus are definitely difficult to differentiate, but still sufficient in most styles – Buds 2 Plus usually has better bass and a full -sound profile.
While I do not like to be waste on anything, sometimes in this world, you get what you pay for, and CMF wireless earbuds are no different. My advice is, if you can buy $ 20 premium on Buds 2 and Buds 2A, you should pay it – get Buds 2 Plus. There is not much difference from the perspective of ANC, but with a sheer sound quality, Buds 2 Plus earns their premium-shingling name, and they are still (if we are in a sense of comparison) $ 50 cheaper than ear and $ 10 cheaper than ear (A).
View Buds 2A in Amazon
View Buds 2 on Amazon
View Buds 2 Plus in Amazon
