80,000 BTC moved: What does this mean?
On July 4, 2025, eight Satoshi-era Bitcoin Purses transferred a total of 80,000 BTC. Each wallet contains 10,000 BTC, which sparks unavoidable upheaval in the cryptocurrency space.
The Satoshi era is usually considered in the years from 2009 to 2011. During that time, bitcoin (BTC) can be translated or mined with either regular computer processor. Eight passive bitcoin wallet each has recently sent a transaction of about 10,000 BTC. There has been speculation that quantum computing has transformed the dangers.
The coins were not sent directly to the cryptocurrency exchanges. They went to the new segwit address, which suggests a safety upgradation. Segwit address is considered to be secondary against quantum hazards compared to older people. Older addresses use P2PK or reused P2PK hash (P2PKH), which are more unsafe.
Some posts on X suggested that transfer may show a safety violation or quantum concerns. However, these claims lack evidence and seem to be betting.
Between July 14 and July 15, 2025, only 10 days after the major agitation, the owner of the wallet sent a total of 28,600 BTCs, which now costs more than $ 3 billion in Galaxy Digital. So far, 9,000 BTCs have been sold, perhaps triggering a downtrend on July 15, when BTC dropped by $ 123,000 from its most recent all-time high.
Do you know In 2011, the price of bitcoin came up between $ 0.78 and $ 3.37 when Whale bought bitcoin. On an average at $ 2.45 per bitcoin, 80,000 BTC would have invested the whale an initial investment of $ 197,200. Today’s price is about $ 118,000, Whale’s BTC is priced at $ 9.44 billion, which is around 4,800,000%.
What is the quantum risk for bitcoin?
Quantum technology is a threat to bitcoin as it can compromise the private key of your wallet. This can potentially risk all the bitcoins you do in that wallet.
Many believe that quantum computers can break bitcoin networks and pose a serious risk for its survival. Bitcoin developers are upgraded to the system to deal with future risks, although the real danger is still far from years. They focus on dormant bitcoin purse, as they are at greater risk than quantum attacks.
Quantum can take advantage of weaknesses in asymmetric cryptography protecting bitcoin purse. This includes the elliptical curve digital signature algorithm (ECDSA) that uses for bitcoin protection.
Bitcoin wallets are protected by ECDSA to generate a pair of private-public keys. If the ECDSA algorithm is compromised, your bitcoin is at risk. Experts feel that practical quantum attacks can occur in five to 20 years and can see 2030–2048 as possible dates.
Older wallets are the weakest for a quantum attack, as they use P2PK or reused P2Pkh addresses, where public key is exposed. It is estimated that 5.9 million BTCs (about 25%of the supply) are in P2PK or reuse P2PKH address; Therefore, those coins are unsafe for future quantum attacks.
80,000 BTC moved from P2 PK address. His public keys were not yet exposed as these were old bitcoin transactions that were spent earlier. This meant that he was quantum-safe at that time. Taking them to segwit address increases security.
Bitcoin developers, led by CASA founder and Chief Technology Officer Jameson Lop, have proposed a Bitcoin Improvement Motion (BIP) to address the possible threat of quantum computing quantum computing for safety of bitcoin. The proposal aims to protect the network by freezing and phasing the unsafe wallets for quantum attacks, which can be probably compromised in a supply of about 25% of the supplies of bitcoin, including the estimated 1 million BTC conducted by Satoshi Nakamoto.
Bitcoin whale passive for 14 years
Arkham bitcoin whale analysis has analyzed eight purse and found that they belong to the same unit. There was speculation that who is the most recent bitcoin whale.
A crypto whale is a person or unit that holds sufficient amounts of a particular cryptocurrency, which is often sufficient to probably affect market prices. A bitcoin whale, which suddenly moves 80,000 BTC after 14 years of inaction, was not going to go to anyone. Bitcoin whale trackers analyze blockchain data and transactions, but being an open account book, blockchain appears to all.
Suspicious activity was recorded a day before the main BTC transfer. The transaction of 10,000 bitcoin cash (BCH) was done from the respective wallet cluster, possibly to test private key access. This raised speculation of a potential hack, as noted by the coinbase director Connor Grogan, although no evidence has been found yet.
Nevertheless, one of the most supported principles is that it was the bitcoin movement of Roger Ver due to his early participation with bitcoin since 2011. Ver, also known as “Bitcoin Jesus”, was arrested in Spain in April 2024 on US tax evasion charges. They are accused of failing to pay $ 48 million on the price of bitcoin.
He was released on bail in June 2025, just before the agitation, further speculation that the wallets are his.
Do you know These 10,000-BTC movements come from eight wallets. Each one of the largest bitcoin marks transactions. The previous record for the largest single transaction in bitcoin history was only 3,700 BTC.
What are OP_Return Messages?
OP_Return Message is a feature of bitcoin blockchain that allows users to embed the maximum size data, directly in a transaction with a maximum size of 80 bytes, which marks the output as unexpected.
From 1 July to July 4, 2025, four OP-Return messages were added to Bitcoin blockchain. These messages were sent to several purse at the same time.
First, on 1 July, 2025, 00:30 pm, reads:
“Legal notice: We have captured this wallet and its content.” ,
Three additional messages were sent in the next few days, concluding on July 4, 2025. A message gave an ultimatum to the owner of the wallet. They need to prove ownership by doing an onchane transaction with their personal key by 30 September, 2025.
There is no evidence of hack. This is more likely for a planned spam campaign. This can be to show the control to the owner of the wallet to move to the fund. Scammers often target passive purse, claiming that they are abandoned.
The spam campaign speculated on various online platforms. Some? Guessed This was a “legal stunt” or scam to pressurize the owner of OP_RETURN Message Whale to manifest himself.
Other called Message “blockchain frescoes.” This is often a way to fill the series with bold data. However, their specific focus and timing show clear intentions.
