Follow ZDNET: Add us as a favorite source On Google.
Key takeaways of zdnet
- Anthropic published his education report, analyzing the cloud use of teachers.
- Teachers grade students are using clouds to help in case of a controversial use.
- AI companies are doubling equipment for education.
Most of the focus on AI in education is how students will be affected by AI equipment. Many people are worried that cheating AI of critical thinking skills and AI erosion will reduce their quality of education. However, the latest education report of Anthropic focuses on the teachers’ approach on AI in class – and some surprisingly reveals that teachers are implementing technology.
Also: According to Anthropic, college students are using Cloud AI
AI companies are aware of the experience of stress users between using AIs as a copillot or support and allows it to automate parts of their work. Anthropic analysis shows how teachers are navigating that stress, and those options differ on a case based on the case.
To operate it ReportAnthropic analyzed Cloud.AI, its chatbot, and unknown interactions between the free and pro accounts associated with higher education email address, and filtered for education-specific tasks from May and June 2025 from May and June 2025. Within the time period, 74,000 conversations associated with tasks such as syllabi, grading assignments, and much more were identified.
The company matched the most suitable work of each conversation with the list of educational works in the US Labor Department Vocational information network (O*net) database. Separately, Anthropic also stated that it extended its analysis from the faculty members of 22 Northeast University with survey data and qualitative research, which take early adoption of AI.
For the complete breakdown of the setup, you can read the report. Now for conclusions.
Some teachers are automated to grading
Anthropic found that AI’s most common use for teachers were courses development (57%) and educational research (13%). In the case of a small use, however, Anthropic found that the remaining 7% of the teachers used clouds to “assess the student’s performance”, including reacting to students, grading against rubricics, and summarizing the evaluation-many teachers shared that despite the Autalluk.
Also: AI agents arrive in American classes
When teachers used clouds for grade, they rely on the point of automation of about half time – 48.9%on it. “Despite the teacher concerns about this evaluation tasks, our surveyed faculty rated it as an area where he felt that AI was at least effective,” anthropic.
In contrast, the report showed that the teachers used AI to increase tasks such as teaching and instructions, grant proposals, educational advice, and supervision of educational work. In addition to grading, high-automation trends included finance and funds of educational institution, maintaining students records, and managing educational entry and enrollment-many of which could be more administrative-thus.
The pattern of those options suggests that teachers are more inclined to automate technical functions. However, for those who require more complex and important thinking, teachers will use AI to cooperate instead.
Also: where AI teachers are replacing teachers – and how it will work
Anthropic stated that the suggesting of automatic grading belongs to a high percentage – essentially expressing an alarm on the idea that teachers are handing over such a sensitive part of teaching to AI. Concern is at least a partial acceptance that AI cannot be recommended for such tasks, and some lack of faith in the part of the anthropic expresses that the cloud should be used in this way.
Citing moral concerns and accuracy issues, a Northeast Professor Anthropic worked with consent: “I tried some experiments where I had an LLM grade paper, and they are not just enough for me. And morally, students are not paying tuition for LLM time, they are paying for my time.
Even as the smallest use case, Anthropic stated that this was the second most automatic function.
Anthropic wrote, “It is not clear that to what extent the factor of these AI-related reactions in the final grade and feedback shows the conversation exposed by our research to the cloud.”
Other methods using teachers AI
Cases of other unique use found in data include creating mock legal scenario for educational simulation, developing workforce training materials, drafting recommended letters and making meeting agenda.
While the North Eastern Faculty reported AI as a more common case for its own learning, Claud.AI analysis was not able to confirm it due to challenges with the filtering mechanism. The Northeast Faculty suggested that teachers are taking advantage of AI for these tasks as AI can automate teduned tasks, cooperate as an idea partner, and personalize learning experiences for students, according to reports.
Also: My Top 5 Free AI Equipment for School – and how can they help you supercharged your learning
Beyond the use of existing equipment to help the classroom, teachers are also building their own AI equipment. For example, Anthropic stated that teachers are often using the convenience of their artworks, which allows users to create an app without coding to create “interactive educational materials”. These works include interactive educational games, assessment and evaluation tools, data visualization, academic calendar and scheduling tools, budget planning, and more.
AI’s education crawling
Just for the back-to-school season for time, AI companies have been On a tear To release marketed equipment on both students and teachers. Anthropic recently launched a new learning mode in Cloud.AI Chatbot and Cloud Code, a complement for the study mode of OpenaiI–The plants have intended to plan the Socratic method to create a back-end-for with the user instead of spitting the answer. In other places, Text-to-Spich App Specifying launched a contestant for the Notebooklum’s AI Podcast Tool, and Google made college students for free, a $ 20-mahne suit of AI Tools.
Also: Why do AI chatbots make a bad teacher – and how can teachers exploit that weakness
A university contract can be attractive, separating the debate about the role of AI in education for a moment – as can create a student dependence on your equipment to get through a difficult semester. Given how burnt teachers are according to the definition, especially given Kovid -19 related Migration by profession, is it really surprising that some teachers are changing their tunes when they automated parts of their jobs with AI? Can an industry gunning be in the workflow of all, including the classroom, can express concern when this starts when this starts, especially without policy to restrict some uses of AI, or guide themselves to those companies?
AI in class is still very newborn to explain where it will go, but for now, AI companies are a complex future for education – and are building. Personal schools and university policies can eventually determine the results, and yet, with a limited scope of control, because these devices remain so easily accessible.
