He argued that there is no morality between two opponents of two diameter. “Imagine if a company found that their product was used to bypass Microsoft defender, a common defensive equipment,” he said. “क्या माइक्रोसॉफ्ट को तुरंत चेतावनी देने के लिए एक नैतिक दायित्व है? या, क्या यह पर्यावरण की निगरानी करने के लिए Microsoft की जिम्मेदारी है, अपने स्वयं के उपकरण की विफलताओं की पहचान करना, रिवर्स इंजीनियर क्यों विफलता हुई, और फिर नए हमले की भरपाई के लिए डिफेंडर को बदल दिया? स्पष्ट रूप से, Microsoft ने हमेशा अपने स्वयं के उपकरण की देखभाल करने की जिम्मेदारी संभाली है, और इसे प्रभावी बनाने के लिए, और इसे To make effective.
“Similarly, it is not responsible to go into the elastic shelter to go into the shelter to tell the shelter how their equipment is being used, or how they can find out,” he wrote.
“Shelter has not made his case,” kept a beggar. “There is no ‘moral violation’. Elastic did a big job to find ‘enemy’ and enjoy the reward to report to the world. Shelter has tried to take a high moral road, may be ‘inconvenience’ for ‘inconvenience’ to apologize to his customers.
