The Tram Administration’s Tax Bill – is also called its “big, beautiful bill”, which is facing a vote today – a rule that will prevent states from implementing their own AI law for five years, and AI will stop the funds for infrastructure to $ 500 million if they do not follow the state.
Over the weekends, the senators also added exemption for improper or misleading practices and state laws targeting child sexual abuse materials (CSAM). The initial version of the rule – which banned states from implementing AI regulation for 10 years and made broadband internet funding dependent on the compliance with the states – was not responsible for those cases.
How to work
If passed, the rules constitutionally prevent states from implementing the AI law for five years and at the same time put AI funding in Limbo for states. This will not only affect the progress law; The laws that have already passed will remain in writing, but will become effectively useless, it is not that they want to put their AI funding on the line.
Apart from this: Does ‘Openi for the government’ mean AI policy for us
In practice, it will effectively create a patchwork imbalance across the country: some states will have a complete law, but there will be no funding to safely pursue AI, while others have no regulation to maintain in the race, but there are plenty of funding.
Jonathan Walter, a senior policy advisor to the Center for Civil Rights and Technology of the Leadership Conference, said, “State and local governments should have the right to protect their inhabitants against harmful technology and keep companies responsible in account.”
The federal AI policy remains unclear
The administration is due to issuing its AI policy on 22 July. Meanwhile, the country is effectively blind, which has inspired many states to introduce its AI bills. Under the Biden administration, who took some steps to regulate AI were states Already presenting AI law As technology developed rapidly in unknown.
Walter said that the ambiguity of the language of the ban could prevent the monitoring of the non-AI-managed automation states, including “insurance algorithms, autonomous vehicle systems, and models that determine how much the residents pay for their utilities.”
“The main issue here is that there are already real, solid losses from AI agent provider conveyor CEO and Pentagon Regulatory Advocate CEO Ballev, and this law is going to carry a brake without anything without anything.”
When the federal regulation is still a major question mark by preventing states from implementing individual AI policy, the Trump administration opens the door for AI companies to grow rapidly without any check or balance-which Ballave called a “dangerous regulatory vacuum” that gives companies to “for a decade-long time to deploy potentially harmful ai systems without a decade-long time.”
Given how fast AI has developed since the launch of Chatgate in 2022, a decade is technically technically EON.
President Trump’s second term does not suggest that AI safety is a priority for federal regulation. Since January, the Trump administration has overroded the security initiative and test participation taken by the Biden administration, shrinkage and the test. Namely The US AI Safety Institute cuts funding for “Pro-in-Innovation, Pro-Cenes” US Center, and AI research for innovation.
Also: AI leaders should hold a tight on regulator, geopolitical and mutual concerns
“Even if President Trump completed his time limit for a comprehensive AI policy, it is unlikely that it would seriously address the horms from the defective and discriminatory AI system,” Walter said. Financial applications such as determining mortgage rates to the AI system used for HR tech, hiring and financial applications are shown to act with prejudice towards the margins and can display racism.
Apparently, AI companies have expressed a priority for federal regulation on individual state laws, which will keep obedient models and products easier than trying to follow the patchwork law. But in some cases, states may need to determine their rules for AI, even with a federal foundation.
Ballev explains, “The differences between states in relation to AI regulation reflect various outlooks, which are on the underlying issues of the states, such as the Employment Law, Consumer Protection Act, the privacy law and the civil rights,” says Ballave. “AI regulation needs to be included in these existing legal plans.”
He said that it is intelligent for states for “diversity of regulatory schemes”, as it “promotes accountability, as states and local authorities are closest to people affected by these laws.”
Also: The new AI models of anthropic for classified information are already in use by US village
Bill passed the House of Representatives with the displeasure of some Republican representatives, who like their states, say how they protect their rights, jobs and privacy in front of the rapidly expanded AI. Now a vote is awaited in the Senate; As Thursday, Senate MP Republican asked to write down the headlines again To clarify that this will not affect the current $ 42.25 in broadband funding.
Previous proposals stopped internet fund
Broadband Equity, Access and Perinogen (Beed) There is a $ 42 billion program run by the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) that helps states to build infrastructure to expand high -speed internet access. Before it was revised, the Senate Rules must have earned money to all of them, as well as $ 500 million in new funding, contingency on states supporting their own AI laws.
Get top stories of morning with us in your inbox every day Tech Today Newsletter.
