Smartwatch is now over 25 years of age, but a decade ago, Apple helped kickstart the current smartwatch industry with a launch of origin. Apple WatchFrom focusing on fitness to selection of apps and eccentric clock faces, the initial smartwatch bore very little equality with the current best smartwatch, with which we are now addicted.
The only problem with Apple Watch is that it was, and still, is exclusive to the iPhone. To answer this and to capitalize on the demand for smartwatch from Android users, Google and its partners developed an Android-Integrated Options. After several recurrences, Wear OS was born, but it still faces many challenges after many years.
To meet these needs, companies like OnePlus have turned to RTO (Real-Time Operating System), a special type of operating system that is perfect for low-power functions where accuracy requires accuracy, such as timekeeping. However, is RTOS Google’s answer to wear? let’s take a look.
Major benefits of RTO
RTO has been around for a long time. Long before its applications in Smartwatch Space, it is strengthening a series of devices and technologies that have benefited you. These include devices such as pacemakers for the heart, flight ticket booking platforms and even radar.
The smartwatch running RTOS is technically using a platform called Frertos. It is designed to enable the execution of a specific set of features on single chipset with limited memory, and it does not consume a significant amount of power to do so. Severe, it provides a fast experience and allows you to use many advanced features, such as heart rate tracking, without the need for a large battery or a powerful chipset.
RTOS-based platforms have long been used in smart devices that do not run wearer OS, such as smartwatch from amazefit or Xiaomi, or something Best fitness trackers. OS’s accuracy means that it is ideal for facilities such as heart rate monitoring, but it comes with an important negative side than wearing.
How is OS better than RTO
RTO provides many benefits to users and watchmakers, but has a major negative side: limited app support. This means that the end-user is at mercy of the company’s fitness apps, features and watch faces, and it makes it very difficult to switch the platforms without losing data.
In comparison, Wear OS takes away all the device away from the manufacturer and ensures continuity between various devices running the same platform instead. You have access to a wide range of OS-compatible apps, and your data stays with you as soon as you switch your data.
Like your Android phone, Wear Wear OS supports every major app and facilitates a dedicated section within Google Play Store. It is a platform that strengthens every smart device, but, given the need for a small battery in most wearable equipment, it does so at the cost of power and efficiency.
Two competitive implementation of RTO
Some companies are perfectly committed to the OS platforms that wore. Samsung has long abandoned its goals of developing its tizen-based OS, which is in favor of partnering with Google on Google, while many third side are also making something Best Android Smartwatch.
However, companies like OnePlus and Motorola have displayed that RTO can be a viable option for smartwatch, where batteries are more important than life and efficiency advanced features. As a result, we have two separate implementation of RTO that both bring the same benefits.
Motorola has announced its new Moto Watch Fit Smartwatch, which runs entirely on the RTOS platform. This means that the company had to develop a fitness app in the house, as well as many apps that repeat the main functionality of the wearing OS. Meanwhile, OnePlus announced the OnePlus Watch 3 earlier this year, connecting the RTO and wears the OS in the same device through its innovative double-architecture approach.
Importantly, both devices to redeem the benefits of RTO, but only reduces the potential downside of an RTO.
Is RTOS Google’s answer to wear?
The manufacture of a smartwatch with advanced fitness features is not easy. Since Google Wear continues to expand functionality within OS, it also means that modern Android smartwatch also requires large batteries. Unfortunately, this means that companies have a large battery, small display, a high price, or a thick smartwatch and a subsequent experience to compromise in any field.
It is not surprising that companies turn to RTO, but can it be the answer to the major wear OS problems? The biggest challenge is battery life, but when Moto Watch Fit offers a 16 -day battery life, it does not provide the benefits of the wearer OS. Instead, Google should consider OnePlus and its double-architecture approach.
OnePlus Watch 3 basically switchs between RTOS platforms for all low-power tasks and wears OS for more advanced features. The results are the best in both the world, and a battery that goes up to four times as Google’s own pixel watch 3.
If the wearer OS is to provide a competitive challenger to the Apple Watch, it needs to solve major problems. OnePlus Watch 3 indicates that a dual-architecture approach with RTO may be solutions, but if not, we will probably see more RTO watches and low-wear OS watches in the future.
