Chatgpt is estimated. Agree. boring. It just agreed with me – even when I am clearly wrong. Then, by accident, I got an AI that opposite the opposite – and I am bent.
I can’t stand chatgate by calling me “genius”
Chatgpt is uncontrolled. Every time I responded with my opinion, the chat returned, “You are perfect!” If I caught a mistake in my previous messages, “Great catch! This shows that you really understand your work!” It was cute for the first five seconds. With a hundredth praise, I was ready to shout.
There is a reason that people try to continuously gelbrack – nothing to do malicious, but to remove its absurd default instructions.
Honestly, I think what will chatgate do this. Openai wants customer retention. We have moved beyond the point where the LLM niche equipment were; They are now mainstreams. More and more average users-including older people who prefer a friendly, non-cross experience-are herds for them. If the chatgpt keeps praising as the “talent” of the average joies, which provides a “great approach”, they are more likely to come back.
This strategy works, but not for someone who wants results and not chit-chat. It begins as being mildly disturbed but quickly becomes a real barrier. When I present a half -ripened ideas in search of real criticism, the chatgate burys any possible criticism under the mountain of false flattery. If it identifies any problem, I have to dig through layers of praise to find them.
Connected
How do I stop AI Chatbots from agreeing with me all the time
Continuous compromise is not intelligence.
Groke is an unconventional savior
I am locked in Openai’s ecosystem. I have talked about that when chatgate went offline for a day, but all the chats with the memory upgrade, it knows me very well. I have set up projects, customized instructions, created individual GPTs, and originally made every effort to tailor it.
Due to these adaptations, I have not discovered other AI options in the long run. I was out with a friend when we decided to test the grouke, and its voice mode immediately impressed me. Beyond the material, the speed of the response blew up the chat alone.
I was so entangled in chat that I never tried for myself. Perhaps Groke is not yet powerful as the GPT model of Openai, but unlike Chatgpt, the Groke actually lets you use it. After all, an AI is only good as its signals and default instructions. If the instructions are terrible, the processing power or data volume becomes meaningless.
Logical personality
When I opened the voice mode settings of Groke, a list of personality and animated avatar appeared. Immediately attracted my attention (different from some suspicious options) was a logical personality.
I chose it, and then at that time raised the voice of a frustration in my mind – something that I brought with chat, and the chat valid it.
Groke immediately flipped the script. Instead of agreeing and falling, it challenged me. This questioned my perspective and pushed me to give proof. Frankly, it was cruel.
I am angry or disappointed to talk with AI, but I never felt under the attack by AI. It was psychologically interesting for me how I could not stop the conversation to save myself. Groke forced me to protect my ideas from strictly or put my harsh criticisms at risk as valid.
The exchange continued to move forward until I managed to soften my stance something – but still, I felt roasted. This was a fierce experience, especially because I started with some personal and meaningful without expecting such a rapid investigation.
I do not have a premium subscription for the grouke, so what I have experienced is with free Groke 3 models. I think the premium models are even better.
Right the sound mode
Even more surprising was that the voice mode of the grouke was effective. This is actually felt like a lesson-based interaction, simply distributed orally-how to act unanimously. In contrast, the “advanced” voice mode of chatgpt seems severely limited and disappointing. It often loses reference, ignores instructions, and reduces all chat shortcomings ten times.
This problem stems from the recognition of openiAI that contingent or old users prefer a pleasant, non-challenging interaction on producers or important people. Grake, Venus, preference effectiveness on enjoyability.
Get an idea from the logical personality of Groke is an achievement. If one of my thoughts really survives, I know that I can make it public – because Groke has already thrown all possible differences, questions and defects. If it lives there, it will catch anywhere.
Chatgpt does not lie lump sum lies – it just coats everything in making optimism sick. Even clearly wrong ideas are called “unique approaches”. The rational mode of the grouke is the opposite: it will challenge you even when you are undeniably correct.
Connected
Chatgpt can still not answer these 4 easy questions
Chatgpt keeps on stumbling on these questions – can you solve them?
Of course, the criticism of grouke is impartially “not true.” Remember that it is an LLM that manipulates only words. This is not really thinking or reason, despite what marketing can suggest.
Grake will challenge you equally on correct statements and wrong people. It is tireless by design. Treat its critics such as stress explations, not the most, final decision. What to take the land, what does not do, then move forward.
